Please Sign In or Create an account
Transference, Countertransference and the Conversational Model.

Transference, Countertransference and the Conversational Model.

It has been said that transference and countertransference are two of the most central constructs in the practice of psychotherapy. Although different schools conceptualise these key ideas in slightly different ways that reflect their core underlying assumptions, they all share the notion that there is a repetitive dimension to each person’s behaviour that also emerges in therapy, that one may not be aware of. The meaning of these terms has expanded over the years to such an extent that in some circles transference and countertransference have come to mean all of the behaviours that emerge in therapy. Although there may be much truth in such a “universal” perspective, the value of these constructs may be compromised and dimished when their specificity is lost.

The Conversational Model proposes restricting the use of the concept of transference to those repetitive elements that come from a traumatic relational past and that one may be unaware of. The Conversational Model is a “Relational Model” that highlights the importance of mutually regulated, co-constructed, and overlapping expectational fields.

Supervision offers one of several potentially safe spaces where one can explore one’s own understanding of these traumatic elements, in order to overcome any potential limitations that can arise when a poor understanding may disrupt the progress of therapy. Dr Lianos will give an overview of the ideas of transference and countertransference as conceptualised from within the Conversational Model, before proceeding to discuss the importance of exploring these issues in clinical supervision.

Psychotherapy Supervision

Working in the Flame. Conversational Model Psychotherapy with the Narcissistic Borderline Client

Self Coming Into Being

On Observing in the Clinical Setting – How Does One ‘See’ In Psychotherapy

The Effects of Trauma on the Therapist

The Use of the Group in Training Therapists: A Holographic Perspective

Traditional models of training in group work have utilised the group as a resource and in vivo situation for skills demonstration, practice and supervision.  In this presentation we will explore the boundaries of this use of the group to extend to the group as a trainer, supervisor and as the ground of a holistic wisdom above and beyond that of the group members.  Such conceptualisation offers alternative lens for viewing the group that derive from the field perspective of Gestalt therapy.

Supervision and Massive Psychic Trauma: Managing Deep Projections and Unbearable Realities.

People who have been subjected to human rights violations invariably suffer from overwhelming levels of fear and anxiety which threaten the integrity of the personality. Their feelings permeate the

A therapist in therapy - minefields and goldmines

As a consumer of therapy, what do you do with feeling totally exposed in a first session - simply by the therapist's way of being? How can you trust when the physical layout is not inviting but distancing? What if you feel criticised and judged; or worse, abused? All natural and perhaps frequent reactions but what if the therapist is unaware? Or aware and silent? Is it all grist for the mill to work through? Or unnecessary angst? What if the promise of a therapist is unrealised? How does a consumer of therapy begin the onerous task of seeking yet again? And again? What unrealistic expectations are brought into the next room? What damage are therapists doing without knowing? What good are they doing without knowing? Can they ever really know? These questions are explored in a personal and reluctant journey into therapy by a beginning therapist.